Legal News

News

Crime

[03/10] Calif. jury recommends death for serial killer
[03/10] Conviction vacated for Mass. man who ran over duck
[03/10] 2 accused of giving day care kids sleep supplement
[03/10] Female teacher in teen sex case appears in court
[03/10] Drug arrests latest black mark on RI police force
[03/10] Pa. woman's indictment shows evolution of terror
[03/10] Son: Ohio State shooting survivor getting better
[03/10] Check on Ohio State gunman found no criminal past
[03/10] Ohio State shooter complained bosses were unfair
[03/09] Man dead after killing 1 officer, wounding another

More...

Personal Injury

[03/10] Feds probe Toyota Prius crash in NYC suburb
[03/10] CDC uses shopper-card data to trace salmonella
[03/10] Workers stuck on open drawbridge in Fla. rescued
[03/09] SUV backs into Mich. school; 6 students injured
[03/09] Superintendent accidentally fires gun during class
[03/09] Park, slain trainer's family want video suppressed
[03/09] Hoped-for drop in childbirth deaths not happening
[03/09] Ohio State janitor's gunfire kills co-worker, self
[03/09] Pa. suit: Bank wrongly repossessed home, took bird
[03/08] UN says mother-child HIV can be eliminated by 2015

More...

Top Headlines

[03/10] Feds probe Toyota Prius crash in NYC suburb
[03/10] DC courthouse busy with same-sex applications
[03/10] 'Jihad Jane' indictment shows terror's evolution
[03/10] Judge: NYC can keep 'Tavern on the Green' name
[03/10] Mass. court upholds state gun-lock requirement

More...

Product Liability

[03/10] Tainted ingredient sold after salmonella found
[03/10] Runaway Prius driver: Brakes were 'almost burned'
[03/10] FDA: Medtronic brain stimulator missed study goal
[03/10] Police probe Toyota Prius crash in NYC suburb
[03/09] Manufacturer expands pet food recall
[03/09] Prius with stuck accelerator glides to safe stop
[03/08] Roche suspends arthritis drug study after deaths
[03/08] Toyota disputes critic who blames electronics
[03/05] Australian court: Vioxx doubled heart attack risk
[03/05] Intermune shares surge as FDA reviews lung drug

More...

Case Summaries

Criminal Law & Procedure

[03/10] US v. Fisher
Defendant's firearm possession conviction is affirmed where police had probable cause to detain defendant because they were responding to a 911 call late at night, in a high crime area, with every reason to suspect gunplay, and the only vehicle at the scene looked as if it was about to depart.

[03/10] Valdovinos v. McGrath
In a murder prosecution, a denial of petitioner's habeas petition is reversed in part where a reasonable probability existed that the undisclosed Brady material, which included evidence of prior photo lineups, the drugs and gun found in a government witness's possession, and the favorable treatment the witness received for his testimony, could have altered the result of the trial.

[03/10] Clos v. Corrections Corp. of Am.
In an action by a prisoner claiming that he suffered disability discrimination related to his severe hearing loss, plaintiff's appeal from partial summary judgment for defendants is dismissed where the district court's conclusory order provided no basis for a finding that plaintiff would face hardship or injustice by waiting to appeal until his remaining claim against defendants was fully resolved.

[03/10] US v. Wilder
Defendants' drug conspiracy convictions and sentences are affirmed where: 1) the district court did not err in excluding a document as hearsay because a witness was unable to verify that the proffered document was a public record created by the police department; 2) the government established that defendant knowingly and intentionally joined an agreement to distribute controlled substances; 3) the court was not convinced that the trial record presented an obvious case of a defendant with no predisposition to distribute crack cocaine, such that the district court plainly erred by failing to instruct the jury on entrapment; and 4) the district court explained that it had considered all of the 18 U.S.C. section 3553(a) factors, including the nature and circumstances of the offense and defendant's history and characteristics.

[03/10] US v. Oglesby
In a prosecution for being a felon in possession of a firearm, district court's denial of defendant's motion to suppress is affirmed as, based on the factors on the record and the totality of the circumstances, the officer clearly had articulable facts upon which he could reasonably suspect that defendant was armed or dangerous. Moreover, the pat-down search was extremely limited in scope as the officer's pat-down frisk of defendant was isolated to the right side of his waistband area.

[03/10] Cameron v. N.Y.
In an action for false arrest and malicious prosecution, judgment for defendant-officers is reversed where: 1) prosecutors' opinions as to probable cause and complaining officers' credibility are irrelevant in virtually all cases involving claims of malicious prosecution; and 2) the introduction of such evidence was not harmless because it provided strong external validation for propositions that otherwise would have come in only from the defendants' mouths.

[03/10] US v. Gardner
Defendants' drug and firearm possession convictions are affirmed where, when a defendant acquires a firearm using drugs as payment, he possesses the firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime in violation of 18 U.S.C. section 924(c)(1)(A).

[03/10] US v. Ternus
Defendant's conviction for conspiracy to transport in foreign commerce stolen goods valued at $5,000 or more, knowing the goods to have been stolen, is affirmed where: 1) defendant's guilty plea waived all non-jurisdictional defects in the proceedings against him; and 2) the district court was not required to define "foreign commerce" in order to adequately explain the nature of the charges against him.

[03/09] US v. York
Defendant's conviction and sentence for arson and carrying a destructive device are affirmed where: 1) there was sufficient evidence that the fire at issue was intentionally set; 2) the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying defendant's motion for a mistrial, because defendant failed to show that he was prejudiced by a jury note requesting to hear again defendant's confession; and 3) evidence that defendant had harmed his girlfriend went to issues other than defendant's character because it explained that she withheld information from the police due to her fear of defendant's threats.

[03/09] US v. Banegas
Defendant's drug conspiracy conviction is reversed where the trial court failed to state particularized reasons for requiring defendant to be shackled while defending himself pro se.

More...

Associated Press text, photo, graphic, audio and/or video material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. Neither these AP materials nor any portion thereof may be stored in a computer except for personal and non-commercial use. Users may not download or reproduce a substantial portion of the AP material found on this web site. AP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions therefrom or in the transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages arising from any of the foregoing.